THE INDIAN DREAMER

I read a post on the blog The Stupidest Man on Earth where the writer justifies an Indian military attack on Pakistan. He says:

"This is by all definitions a foreign attack on Indian soil. India is not a Muslim country, and its own Muslim minority, apart from Kashmiris, by and large does not have a beef with the central government. There is no indigenous jihadi movement (SIMI’s radicalisation is, of course, a point of contention); what there is, is mostly encouraged, if not overtly funded, by Pakistan. In fact, India is the only non-Muslim country in the world where foreign-supported Islamic terrorists have killed hundreds of people since 2001. (I’m discounting Israel, as I think its problems are largely home-grown.)

So here’s the thing: If the U.S. was almost unanimously considered as being within its legal rights to attack Afghanistan after 9/11, wouldn’t an Indian attack on Pakistan be equally justified? Doesn’t a country have the right to defend its citizens from outside aggression?"

Read the entire post here


Related Stories:
Scared Pakistan begs in China, tries to appear defiant.
Pakistan is really scared, knows what cost it has to pay
We will reply strongly : Pakistan warns India
Pakistan is not afraid of America